Advantages of reduced hierarchy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Advantages of snipd power structure - Essay ExampleIn the past, pecking order helpered to define the role of employees at bottom the same organization. It also outlines the alliance between employees. Hierarchy makes organizations stand out with limited control spans. Several organizations are becoming flatter, decrease levels of hierarchy and widening the span of control. There are several reasons to explain this promising trend among the hierarchal organization. However, hierarchical organizations have their share of disadvantages. First, hierarchy makes organizations assume a bureaucratic nature. This can s utter the solvent rates to the studys of customers within the operations of the organization. Additionally, hierarchy in organizations contributes to the weakening of communication links within organizations. Furthermore, since hierarchy assumes a horizontal nature of information flow, some beneficial decisions can remain with the bakshis of the hierarchy, making the employees at the bottom of the hierarchy disadvantaged (Fernandez & Gonzalez, 2001, p. 108). Based on these reasons, many organizations are resorting to the drop-off of hierarchical levels within the organization. This paper give explore some of the advantages reduced hierarchal would benefit an organization. The need to stay profitable in the fast changing business environment has made business organizations examine their management styles. Organizations whose hierarchal structures are tall are less in all probability to respond quickly to outside changes compared with entities with flatter hierarchal structures. The need to hasten the structure of management of any business enterprise requires the execution of instrument of the process of delayering. This allows a business organization to remove some structures in its hierarchy to maintain a flatter hierarchal structure. Although this process has some disadvantages to the business, it also has multiple benefits as well. Hier archical organizations ensure that employees at the apex of the hierarchy enjoy greater prestige and privileges as compared to persons at the base of the hierarchy. As practically as this benefits people at the top of the hierarchy in terms of increased self-esteem, self worthy and other material benefits, it also contributes to the disorientation of the employees at the bottom of the hierarchy. As a result, these people will feel disadvantaged due to increased feelings of low self-esteem, limited or lack of access to handouts and low self worth. Consequently, their output would drastically reduce. Consequently, the productivity of the organization would equally reduce as well. It is necessary that organizations reduce their hierarchal levels to reverse this trend (Wallgrun, 2010, p. 119). Hierarchy in organizations ensure that somebody at the top still deal with the person who is directly under him or her. This implies that a top manager would not likely communicate directly wit h individuals at the bottom of the hierarchy. A hierarchy has several levels meaning that people save work with persons that are immediately below or above them. In case where a certain(p) decision is supposed to reach everyone in the organization, this process would be so unyielding and time consuming. This is because the hierarchy does not address people directly by the top management. However, reducing the multiple levels of hierarchy would help to quicken the flow of information within the organization besides ensuring that little distortion to the information happens. The simplification of hierarchal levels within business organizations would ensure that employees get the opportunity to communicate with each other. This enhances teamwork besides creating a good working atmosphere for the organization.